Saturday, December 25, 2010
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Warming Up
Every year its the same. I forget how amazing the sun feels. I forget how nice it is to slip into cool water after getting hot and sweaty on the walk towards the beach. I forget how good it feels to lie on a rock in the sunshine and stretch out. I forget how satisfying it is to rub your shoulders and feel salt come off on your fingers. I forget how much I love feeling weightless in the water. And I forget how much I miss all of these things in the winter.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
"I'm so appalled"
Sunday, November 14, 2010
I think I hate Carrie Bradshaw
So I’m watching Sex and the City and I’m wondering if all women are exactly the same. Are we that whiny? That irritating? That frustrating? That……..doomed? What if Sex and the City is living my life for me?
This is my Carrie inspired “starting off with a question” piece of writing. Were the writers of Sex and the City spot-on because they were able to capture how women communicate, or have women just managed to convince themselves that that is how we talk? I don’t know. Does Sex and the City offer the lessons that women should learn in order to grow and create meaningful and successful relationships with other people? I don’t know that either because to be honest I’m not old enough to know. My life experience in relationships so far is minimal and a lot of the time I’m just running on instinct or emotion. There are really no rules to work with- we just do whatever we choose to do, and when I say we and I’m talking about my friends specifically. My little own posse of gals that I lunch with, shop with, share secrets with, keep secrets with and basically live my life with. We all watch the show and although some friends love it more than others I know we all see the “truth” that the show presents us with.
I don’t see myself as being particularly similar to Carrie or any of the women on this show because really and truly they never change or evolve from the mistakes they make. I like to think that I do. Maybe. Of course that’s wishful thinking because like Carrie I’m in constant need of attention, like Miranda I don’t know if I believe in romantic love, like Charlotte I’m very naïve in some respects in regards to boys and like Samantha…well no, can’t draw any similarities there I’m afraid. But that’s the safety we find when we turn on Sex and the City- although different men come in and out of their lives, although they move cities or apartments, they’re always going to be those same stock characters that never change. And I don’t know that I’m alright with that.
I hate these women when they’re going on and on about nothing- nothing being men mainly. They’re so boring and repetitive but I think I might hate them because I do the exact same thing. Do I do it because that’s how I am or has Sex and the City decided what my interaction with other women is supposed to be like?
I had an interesting experience this weekend. I got opinions on a situation from three different women. Two friends and one mother. One friend was blunt and told me what I didn’t want to hear. The other friend told me that I should go with what my emotions were telling me and the mother told me to do whatever would make me happy. I appreciated the opinions from all different women and I found the reflections on what they each had to tell me was more important than what they actually had to tell me. I think therein lays the success of Sex and the City. It’s not what they’re actually talking about, it’s the way that even in a group that is SO different to my friends they still can all offer up those confusing and polar opposite opinions that you get from your friends. Which is why we keep watching, but I’m starting to wonder if I’m missing the point a little bit.
I get upset with this show because I like it (I won’t lie), but it does sometimes make me feel a bit “not quite up to it”. I don’t think that women like this exist. Well they might- but I sure haven’t come across them. Of course I’m well aware that I’m 21 and my friends are never going to be like the Sex and the City girls because THEY’RE REAL but these are the women that have shaped the way we approach life and relationships. We watch and experience with them and sometimes I think that they’re living our relationships for us. I don’t ever want to be in “the dating game” because these characters have made it look tiresome and horrible. I just want to meet a nice boy and then that’ll be that.
An advert came on during a break for Head and Shoulders and it had a woman on a date who was panicking because she wanted to scratch her head. She ducks under the table to scratch and then pops up with frazzled hair. Mum made a good point: “Have we just got to the point in our lives were we can’t do anything that’s human- I scratch my head all the time.” I feel that way about Sex and the City. It’s too hard to measure up to all those things they’ve already done. The perfect relationships have already been played out on screen so there’s nothing left for the average woman to achieve. I don’t need to wait for my Mr Big because I can just turn on the TV and there he is. Which makes me a little bit sad to be honest.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Jessica and Frank
Jessica stepped down off the last wooden plank which had been haphazardly nailed to the tree years and years ago. Frank had jumped from the fourth one but he’d been ascending and descending these planks since he was a boy. Jessica had only been on the property for 36 hours so her agility in the huge ‘playground’ that Frank had been talking up for days was not forthcoming. He’d finally decided that this weekend he would take her to visit his mum and dad and the property he’d grown up on. She’d met his mum and dad a few times before this weekend; they liked coming to visit London. They were really nice the first few times she’d met them. His mum’s eyes had positively popped out of her head when she’d met Jessica, introduced as “my new friend”. Frank was lovely so it made sense his parents were lovely. That didn’t stop her from being incredibly nervous each time she spoke to them though. She’d bonded with Paul (Dad) about West Ham’s slow start this season and what changes Avram Grant could/should make to pick up after Christmas (Jessica had a sneaking suspicion Paul was an ex-Mile End Mob member, and, even if he wasn’t she liked the idea of it and imagined him running after Chelsea fans after matches). Janet (Mum) was a classic beauty and the most caring person Jessica had ever met. She had modeled in the early 70’s and even though she was ageing now she still retained that simple beauty that made Jessica feel incredibly self conscious. But Janet had given up her modeling not long after starting because she found the other girls ‘a little bit silly’ and had settled down with Paul soon after they met through friends at the pub. She said she fell for his confidence in wearing a Ben Sherman polo with tight trousers (“Always had a thing for mods I did”) after seeing Paul Weller do it. Paul said it was Janet’s eyes, which made Jessica blush and try her hardest not to look at Frank in case he was looking at her. They’d suggested to Frank that he bring her up the property so she could get some colour back in her cheeks after the long winter spent indoors at her computer writing endless releases for the company and sending them out to every single media outlet she could think of. It had not been a fruitful undertaking and Jessica was beginning to grow concerned that her job was on the line. But all of that was far away now that she was walking alongside Frank down to the edge of the large pond that marked the end of the backyard. Jessica had heard about backyards as a girl but the closest she had come to seeing a proper backyard was when her friend Sammy had invited her to her Gran’s house and her Gran lived in a flat which was on the ground and out the back was a square patch of grass with some flower pots around the sides. But now Jessica understood. She imagined a young Frank running wild through the leaves that would have fallen in autumn from the huge oak tree that stood next to the house. She could see the 9th birthday party that Frank had told her about when his parents had let him have a bouncy castle and all the kids had been absolutely sick with jealousy. It was not long after that party that Frank had stopped bringing other kids round to his place. Even though he had the best backyard in the county, Frank had decided that no one should be able to share his space again. But now 15 years later here he was, with a girl holding his hand walking down from the tree-house he had made with Paul to the edge of the pond. Jessica felt grip Frank had on her hand once they reached the water’s edge tighten and he seemed to hold her back ever so slightly as if to confirm she wouldn’t keep walking right into the water. For the first time since she had arrived at this place she felt slightly uncomfortable. She looked up and Frank’s eyes had glazed over as he surveyed the rippled water of the pond and watched the ducks swim silently across. She’d never seen him look like this, he was usually so focused and attentive. He was far away now thinking about something he hadn’t thought about since he’d met Jessica a few months ago. She’d managed to block everything out particularly well and he was happy to have met her. She was beautiful, funny and completely unaware of the effect she had on the men around her, but suddenly being here in this space with her seemed like a terrible idea. Jessica squeezed Frank’s clammy hand with hers and he snapped quickly out of the distant daydream.
“I need to tell you something about this pond”.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Fixing smelly cows
One of the greatest challenges to the fight against climate change may be diminished significantly thanks to ground breaking research being performed at the University of Western Australia.
Dr Kioumars Ghamkhar is the head of a team which is mapping the genes in legumes which end up producing the most harmful gas in regards to climate change- methane.
Dr Ghamkhar and his team are researching the different types of legumes that cattle and sheep eat, in order to distinguish which ones end up producing the least amount of methane when digested by these animals.
In a world first for the mapping of plant genes, Dr Ghamkhar is hopeful that the research will have a significant effect on the problems farmers could eventually face in terms of climate change regulations.
"The aim is to reduce the effect of what farmers are doing on the environment", he says. "We want to create legumes with the best feeing value with the lowest methane emissions".
Although results are still a few years away, the potential for a positive step for farmers and avoiding climate change is great.
Monday, November 1, 2010
To Facebook or not to Facebook?
Yes I have just been to see The Social Network. Yes I did think it was a great movie. And yes I am moved enough by the subject matter to write something immediately.
I do not want this piece to be a film review. I am not intelligent enough, not have I seen enough films to even begin pretending that I am some how worthy enough to start preaching my own judgment of a film on the internet. Other than I thought it was good. Which it was.
No, this piece I want to be something different. Something that demonstrates a difficulty that I have been struggling with for, oh let’s say at least the last couple of years.
Facebook for me has become a part of my daily routine. I check it very regularly. I didn’t check it daily when I didn’t have the internet at home, and to be completely honest I preferred life that way. I never felt like I missed anything. People used to say “How can you not have the internet/Facebook at home?” and my answer would just be “I just don’t”. Nothing more. Now I have both the internet and Facebook at home and I really do think I’m worse off for it. Not the internet as such, it’s really useful. But Facebook has, again, taken over my life. I wish I could resist it- but I can’t. I’d like to try. And so I’m going to. Eventually.
It is the first week of study before exams for me. I only have one exam however and so my study will basically be reading the lecture slides for the subject and hoping for the best. But the importance of it being study week is that typically this is a week of high activity for my ‘friends’ on Facebook. Procrastination kicks into overload and people begin posting everything and anything they can think of. Names are changed, South Park clips are posted, quizzes about which hip hop star you are are taken, and insane babble is posted to everyone’s wall. I am not immune to this. I don’t even have 4 exams to ignore- just the one, and I’m still able to get involved with the study week insanity. I tried not to today. But I got to maybe…11.45am? I didn’t get involved earlier because I SPECIFICALLY left the house. But it shouldn’t be like that. I shouldn’t have to leave my own home just to ignore a website. A website which makes me smile sometimes, but at other times makes me want to die.
I remember in first year of uni when ‘Monday Night Facebook’ was something I used to look forward too. Everyone put up pictures of the weekend and you talked too the new ‘friends’ you had added/had added you and basically got to relive your own glory. This got stale quickly. Now, three years later, the idea makes me sick to my stomach. But I still check the photos tab for some reason. I still punish myself by looking at the pages of people I know to have a better social life than I do and getting self conscious about it. Why? I don’t know. It’s just part of the phenomenon. But I want it to stop.
My argument used to be “Oh no I stay on Facebook to talk to the people who don’t live in my city”. That’s a blatant lie now. The people I do genuinely want to talk too, I talk to daily- if not, weekly. These are the people I usually end up talking to on Facebook anyway. One of my good friends is far away in Europe, and not even that is a good enough excuse anymore to stay on Facebook. We have email, we can use that. Oh better yet we can get out the pen and write each other a letter. Rather than post that Iggy Pop video we’re just dying to show one another because we’re funny/cool.
I’m in a crisis. A modern crisis. A crisis that would never have eventuated without the internet/Facebook. Am I stressing about Facebook because I’m trying to be different, or is Facebook actually having an effect on who I am?
I’d like to think it doesn’t really matter, but unfortunately it does matter. The time this ‘activity’ takes up in my day is growing increasingly out-of-hand. I shouldn’t think about funny status updates when I hear them, but I do. I shouldn't look at that boy's page AGAIN, but I do. I shouldn’t wake up on a Sunday morning and panic because someone might post a photo/comment from the night before which is incriminating, but I do- not often, I’m not that much of a sicko, but it still happens.
My friend suggested to me the other day that when I get back from Europe in February I should delete my Facebook and I do think it’s a great idea. The people I want to talk to will still be there. And I like the idea that people aren’t meant to stay in your life forever so maybe we’re not supposed to stay ‘friends’ on Facebook. But what until that point? Do I keep facing this daily dilemma with a smile and just laugh at the modern condition? Or do I try and find out what it is that’s really bothering me?
Mark Zuckerberg, you’re a genius but I kinda hate you.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Your Love is my Drug?
Who would have thought that the euphoria we feel when we’re falling in love could actually help with pain relief? A recent study conducted at Stanford University in the US has found that viewing a picture of a loved one can actually stimulate a stronger pain-relief response than the typical ‘distraction’ tests that have previously been trialed. So maybe all those hours you spent fantasizing over that new love-interest could have been helping you relieve your own pain.
The study, conducted on 15 students at university in the United States who described themselves as “intensely in love”, measured the response to pain that each student felt when they looked at a photo of the person they were romantically involved with. To balance the results, measurements in response to pain were also taken when the students looked at photos of another similarly attractive person who they were acquainted with but not romantically involved with and also in response to pain when a simple word-association distraction test was conducted.
All of these conditions were tested at three levels of pain to further substantiate the results. The “pain” which the students were subjected to was differing levels of exposure to heat through a thermal stimulator attached to their left hand. Each student was measured individually to gauge what levels of temperature would cause differing levels of discomfort and they were then subjected to 15 second blocks of the different levels of heat exposure.
The student’s responses to the stimuli were mapped by the MRI imaging of the brain in response to pain in the three conditions the study set up. The scientists conducting the study looked at both the areas of the brain that determine reward responses, or pleasure centres, and those areas of the brain that deal with analgesics- or in other words, painkillers.
In almost all instances, the measurements found that the response to viewing a photo of a person’s loved-one created a greater amount of activity in the areas of the brain that are associated with reward and pain management. Most importantly though, the study found that the response to viewing a picture of a loved one can actually be stronger and more effective in stimulating pain-relief than distraction tests that have long been accepted in the scientific community.
In a recent interview with Tracie White for Science Daily, one of the authors of the study Dr Sean Mackey, a professor at Stanford School of Medicine, said that it was important for the study to focus on younger and more passionate forms of love, which was where the feelings of euphoria were more strongly felt.
“We specifically were not looking for longer-lasting, more mature phases of the relationship. We wanted subjects who were feeling euphoric, energetic, obsessively thinking about their beloved, craving their presence,” he said.
“When passionate love is described like this, it in some ways sounds like an addiction. We thought, 'Maybe this does involve similar brain systems as those involved in addictions which are heavily dopamine-related.' Dopamine is the neurotransmitter in our brain that is intimately involved with feeling good."
The findings of the study are intriguing because the pleasure centres in the brain that were activated during the romantic-partner test are the same as those that are activated when a person takes specific drugs, for example cocaine. A co-author of the study, Jarred Younger, says that the findings are interesting because ultimately the brain responds in a similar way when a person views a picture of the person they are in love with as to when they are taking drugs.
“One of the key sites for love-induced analgesia is the nucleus accumbens, a key reward addiction center for opioids, cocaine and other drugs of abuse. The region tells the brain that you really need to keep doing this.” No wonder thinking and talking about your new partner in the early stages of a relationship seems so addictive!
The implications of this study are far reaching, not only in the field of neuroscience, but also in the field of psychology and the nature of drug addiction. The results of the tests suggest that reward centres in the brain can be activated by a naturally occurring biological method (in that the brain has reacted to a visual stimulus) with the same result as the reaction to illicit drugs that the brain experiences. Addiction to illicit drugs is a ubiquitous problem in western society and the results of the study could influence more study into different, less dangerous ways of stimulating pleasure centres in the brain.
Arthur Aron, co-author of the study, suggests to Tracie White that the findings are indicative of the way the brain responds to a pleasurable stimulus without relying on illicit drugs and reflect a move toward a relatively risk-free stimulus of the pleasure centres in the brain.
“When thinking about your beloved, there is intense activation in the reward area of the brain — the same area that lights up when you take cocaine, the same area that lights up when you win a lot of money…this tells us that you don’t have to just rely on drugs for pain relief. People are feeling intense rewards without the side effects of drugs.”
Although the results do suggest a natural process of inducing pain-relief and stimulating pleasure in the brain, Sean Mackey is not so forthcoming about the partner-test replacing traditional pain medication any time soon.
“I don't see our evoked test being used in a treatment manner. It was specifically designed to only manipulate analgesia and from the perspective of viewing images that would be considered rewarding” he says.
Ultimately we’re still a long way off from using romantic love as a medical or pharmacological cure for the blues, and anyone who has fallen in love could probably tell you they didn’t need a study to tell you falling in love feels great. But the results do help to shed light on the issue of drug addiction. As the same reward centres in the brain are stimulated by the recognition of looking at a loved-one as those that are stimulated when a person takes illicit drugs, the results could be used to further investigate how addictions to these drugs can be more efficiently managed. But the biggest problem that arises from the study- what happens to all of us who aren’t falling in love?
Monday, October 18, 2010
Sheer Perfection

And when you need me I’ll always be here-Rufus Wainwright
Tonight, again, Rufus Wainwright sung only to me. The Perth Concert Hall was filled to the brim, but it was just me and him in the room. This man speaks to me like no other individual can. His lyrics are my thoughts, ordered, and written down so eloquently it astounds me as to how someone else could really and truly be thinking what I’m thinking but telling it so much better than I can.
Rufus Wainwright is painfully talented. A brilliant musician, his control over his vocals is unparalleled and lyrically I don’t think anyone could be as intuitive and as honest as he makes himself. He offers his audience up a part of himself when he sings to them and tonight, just like last time, he offered himself up to me. And not just himself, but he shone a mirror in my face and allowed me to look inside my own head like only he can.
I cannot express what I was feeling. Each song sweeps you in and as you listen to the words you’re taken on a journey through your own thoughts as the loves of your life flash before your eyes and you begin to remember all those little things about everyone you ever loved and how much you miss them and how much you loved being in love. He reminds you about those small little details like the winkles in the side of the first one’s mouth, or the smell of the second one, or the shape of the third one’s shoulders and the pain of loss is almost too much to bear. But then he reminds you that although these loves are too great to forget, there’s going to be many more- each offering you the things you can’t imagine missing now.
For two and a half hours tonight my brain was somewhere else. Away from the noise and business of the day time. Inside the vaulted room I was able to travel back to a time where things were just as complicated but seem so simple now. There was me, him, my dreams and the future we were supposed to have- and still will have.
The first half of the show was like nothing I’d ever seen before. I knew that Rufus was going to play his latest release “Songs For Lulu” in its entirety and I was a little nervous to say the least. The album is a strange one because its just him and the piano. All the songs are vocally demanding (as only Rufus Wainwright can write and perform) and so I was nervous that it wouldn’t measure up to the recording. I was similarly nervous because, as any music appreciator will tell you, a new album takes a while to wash over you and sink into your soul as albums tend to do and this one hadn’t really done that yet. I liked several songs and I had tried to listen to it all the way through a few times but I hadn’t succeeding in accomplishing the task. However, as he entered the stage adorned in a gorgeous cape with feathers around his naked shoulders I immediately lost all hesitations about what was going to unfold in front of me. The piano washed over me and his voice swept me into the place I remained for the entire first half. Completely compelled. The highlights were The Dream and the last song surprisingly, Zebulon, which I hadn’t warmed to very well before tonight, but now I will dream about. With a strange visual accompaniment in the background which was just shots of a darkened eye opening and closing I felt watched, but not threatened. It was a performance like no other and one I will not forget.
The second act was, as expected, warm and charming. In stark contrast to the first act which was engaging but slightly haunting, the second was like an old friend had come over and sat down at the piano in the lounge and just began singing the old songs you used to sing together. I was always partial to the Rufus rendition of Hallelujah rather than the Buckley or Cohen rendition, and tonight’s performance of said song was simply, perfect. Absolutely perfect- his control and command of such a big space with just his voice and a piano is remarkable.
If nothing else, Rufus Wainwright reminded me tonight of why I love him and I love how he speaks to me. I am reminded to do the things I love and be the girl I need to be. And I am forever indebted to him for that.
A few more nice days
Friday, October 15, 2010
Taking a big ol’ step back for feminism!
First off- I don’t hate men. I like men. I love men. I have a great relationship with my dad, my oldest friend is a boy, I tend to spend a lot of time with men and I like them. They’re funny, interesting, different, irritating- all the things that make every other human being on the planet fascinating to the next person. So perhaps I am not the right person to be discussing the woeful situation that has be-felled my mysterious masculine mates. Or perhaps I’m the perfect person to be discussing it.
I need to preface this article by openly stating that I have a negative attitude towards contemporary feminism. I don’t get it. I’m 21- I’ve never lived through a sexual revolution or gender war and for the most part I have surrounded myself with men who treat me as an equal; or at least they try their hardest to do so. So I find myself mystified when females around my age bang on about how shit men are. They’re not that bad! I don’t want to make excuses for men who are genuinely misogynistic or chauvinistic but I think the sooner that women start to realize that not all men are “pigs” the sooner this “equality” that we seem to be so desperate for will materialize. Similarly the sooner we (women), and men, realize that WE ARE DIFFERENT the sooner we can move on from these differences and- if I may be so bold- embrace these differences?
As much as I like men, I can openly admit that I don’t understand them. I have had insights into the ones who have allowed me to get close to them and or who have tried to explain the male “condition” as it were, but these insights are for the most part very specific to the person themselves and in the grand scheme of things I’m just as clueless as the next girl as to how the male brain works. And I’ll bet most men can admit the same about the way girls think. But I think it is unfair for men or women to take this lack of understanding and judge the other gender for it. Its not men’s fault I don’t get them….and its certainly not my fault when men don’t understand me! But please don’t let the lack of understand cloud your judgment about the opposite sex. Embrace it. Surely in an age where we can jump on Google and get an answer for pretty much anything we should rejoice in the things in life we can’t get straight answers for? Maybe that’s just me. But I like the idea of having a bank of unexplored people and experience that lays waiting for me to uncover. Boys- the final frontier?
This little musing is inspired from my exposure more neo-feminism than I care to be exposed to in recent weeks. Let me state, for perhaps the first time, that feminism in its purest form, in its real, true and historical form, was a movement that needed to happen. I may look at the ideal of Betty in Mad Men and think “wow it’d be nice to be able to just marry a beautiful man and have beautiful kids and keep a beautiful house and just be beautiful all day” but really and truly I know I’m not kidding anyone. The women in my gender’s past have done me a tremendous service in allowing me to be the vocal, opinionated and (seemingly) confident young women I am today and I will forever be grateful to them for that. But I refuse to believe that the search for equality between the sexes that these women strove toward was meant to turn into the vicious, spiteful rage that has spawned itself in the modern woman. Men are not the enemy. No one is the enemy. We don’t have to have enemies. But we’re so used to being on the offensive that the ‘enemy’ just keeps rearing its ugly head. Worryingly though I think it’s ourselves that have become said enemy. But I don’t want to spout another “love yourself” rhetorical piece of self-affirming nonsense that we modern gals have grown up reading. The only self-affirmation that a women needs is the safety of being a woman and the understanding that goes along with being a woman. Men are different and scary, but really and truly that’s why we love them right?
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Tears for Riewoldt
Friday, September 24, 2010
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
First Episode of the Exciting Times of Chris Judd and Rebecca Twigley
Sunday, September 12, 2010
University Wars
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Football Evening.

I look forward to nights like this for weeks.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Inspiration
.jpg)
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
New Loves.
Wow three years in between blogs is OK right?







